First Person

Voices: Why I'm against Denver's school bond

Editor’s note: The author of this commentary mistakenly attributes a quote to the report “True North: Goals for Denver Public Schools.” The quote actually appeared in an EdNews story in February 2012, three months before the True North report was published. We appreciate our readers pointing out this factual error.

Denver dad Michael Kiley says he will not support the district’s $466 million bond at the polls in November because he doesn’t trust Denver Public Schools administrators.

I think most Denverites want the best for our children and the best for our schools. We understand the stark reality that Colorado lags far behind most states in funding our schools.

Image of school desk atop a dollar bill.So why would so many Denverites oppose the 3B bond to provide funds to Denver Public Schools for facilities and infrastructure? While we may be happy with our children’s teachers and school leaders, many of us have lost faith in the administration of Denver Public Schools.

The DPS administration has many critics. A+ Denver, a local citizens-based education organization, stated in its report True North: Goals for Denver Public Schools in May 2012 that the Denver Plan, DPS’ strategic plan, is in urgent need of substantial revision.

The report states that the district:

“…needs to have a strategic plan and a strategic vision for how it wants to improve the academic performance of the children in DPS. If the Denver Plan is intended to be that strategic plan (then) it needs to be significantly changed and improved. There are some things that are good, but it is not the kind of strategic plan that any major organization would use to move itself forward and to challenge some very difficult issues.”

Unfortunately, Superintendent Tom Boasberg’s administration has led a school district that is leaving more and more children behind. Boasberg recently touted:

“The number of DPS schools that are meeting or exceeding standards on the SPF (School Performance Framework) continues to rise, with 10 more schools rated this year as Distinguished (Blue) or Meets Expectations (Green).”

But an analysis of 2012 SPF data expands upon those carefully selected results. An opinion piece published in EdNews ColoradoVoices: Watch the spin with Denver’s school ratings, highlights other findings:

“DPS essentially doubled the number of schools in the lowest category… there are 2,065 more students in these lowest category red schools now than a year ago. In fact, there are over 3,700 more students in schools in the worst two categories, and 235 fewer students in schools in the best category.”

Membership on CPAC committee raises more questions

The process by which planned bond projects were selected did little to gain the trust of Denverites. Some 74 members of the community were appointed by Boasberg to form the Community Planning Advisory Committee (CPAC). Only nine CPAC members were listed with “parent” as their primary affiliation. The public could speak at the start of CPAC meetings, but there was no dialogue allowed between speakers and CPAC members. The DPS administration says that DPS teachers and principals gave input early in the process, but no teachers, school principals or DCTA representatives were included on the CPAC.

The result, I believe, was that bond projects were selected more by the influence of the school neighborhood than by their objective importance. Some 53 percent of bond funds will go to non-traditional schools, but only 21 percent of DPS students attended non-traditional – or magnet, charter or alternative – schools in 2012, according to my analysis of the 2012 DPS bond. Our traditional schools have sweltering heat in the summer and serious over-enrollment, yet the DPS administration directs the majority of bond funds to non-traditional schools.

The prime example is the proposed Stapleton/Northfield High School at a cost of $38.5 million. Nearby Manual High School (four miles west toward downtown) and George Washington (five miles south towards the Denver Tech Center) have a combined 1,500 open seats, and Smiley Middle School (two miles west towards downtown) has 381 open seats. The planned location of the new school at E. 56th Avenue and Havana Street is four miles from Stapleton (all distances per Google Maps).

Most troubling is the disclaimer on the DPS administration documentation on the bond:

“Please note that all allocations for 2012 funding are preliminary and may be subject to change.”

In effect, DPS is asking taxpayers for a $466 million blank check.

The DPS administration has a history of poor financial decisions. As the New York Times documented in Aug. 5, 2010, in Exotic Deals Put Denver Schools Deeper in Debt, Boasberg’s mentor Michael Bennet, now a U.S. senator, pushed for a complex financial transaction to pay pension obligations. The article stated:

“Since it (DPS Administration) struck the deal, the school system has paid $115 million in interest and other fees, at least $25 million more than it originally anticipated.”

That $25 million could cover the cost of two brand-new elementary schools.

Opponents of 3B want the opportunity to make critical changes to the bond and put it back on the ballot next year. Our economic recovery is underway but not yet complete, so it is important that we only borrow money for the most critical projects right now. A bond raises property taxes and is in effect a flat tax that asks those with the least income to sacrifice the most.

We can have a better bond next year, so let’s vote against 3B.

First Person

What I learned about the limits of school choice in New York City from a mother whose child uses a wheelchair

PHOTO: Patrick Wall

As a researcher interested in the ways online platforms impact learning and educational decision-making, I’ve been trying to understand how New York City parents get the information to make a crucial decision: where to send their children to school.

So for the past six months, I’ve been asking local parents about the data they used to choose among the system’s 1700 or so schools.

I’ve heard all sorts of stories about the factors parents weigh when picking schools. Beyond the usual considerations like test scores and art programs, they also consider the logistics of commuting from the Bronx to the East Village with two children in tow, whether the school can accommodate parents and children who are still learning English, and how much money the parent-teacher association raises to supplement the school’s budget.

But for some families, the choice process begins and ends with the question: Is the building fully accessible?

The federal Americans with Disabilities Act requires public buildings constructed after 1992 to be fully accessible to people in wheelchairs. However, most New York City public school buildings were constructed prior to that law, and high construction costs have limited the number of new, fully accessible buildings.

As a result, a shocking 83 percent of New York City schools have been found non-compliant with the ADA, according to a two-year federal Department of Justice investigation whose findings the city Department of Education largely disputes. Recently, the city’s Office of Space Management has begun surveying buildings for full accessibility, but more work remains to be done.

One parent’s struggle to find a school suitable for her son, who has a physical disability but no cognitive issues, illustrates what a major role accessibility plays in some families’ decision-making.

Melanie Rivera is the mother of two and a native New Yorker living in Ditmas Park in Brooklyn’s District 22 who shared her story with me — and gave me permission to share it with others. Here is what she told me, in her own words:

My son Gabriel is seven years old. He was born with a condition called arthrogryposis, which affects the development of his joints. His hips, knees, and feet are affected and he has joint contractures, so his legs don’t bend and straighten the way most people’s do. In order to get around, he uses a combination of crutches and a wheelchair.

Before I had my differently-abled son, I was working in a preschool for children with special needs. The kids I worked with had cognitive developmental disabilities.

Despite my professional experience, I was overwhelmed when it was my turn to help my child with different abilities navigate the public school system. I can only imagine the students falling by the wayside because their parents don’t have that background.

When I was completing my son’s kindergarten application, I couldn’t even consider the academics of the school. My main priority was to tour the schools and assess their level of accessibility.

There are only a couple of ADA-accessible schools in my district, and there was no way of indicating on my son’s kindergarten application that he needed one. When we got the admissions results, he was assigned to his zoned school – which is not accessible.

I entered lengthy and extensive mediation to get him into an ADA-accessible school. At that point, I knew I would just have to take what I could get. For families whose children have special needs, “school choice” can ring hollow.

The process of finding any accessible school was a challenge. The DOE website allows families to search for ADA-accessible schools. But the site describes most schools as “partially accessible,” leaving it up to parents to call each school and say, “What do you mean by this?”

When I called the schools and asked, “Are you a barrier-free school?” the staff in the office didn’t know what the term meant. They might reply, “Oh yeah, we have a ramp.” I’d have to press further: “But can you get to the office? Can you get to every floor in the building?” The response was often, “Oh, I don’t know.”

Even the office staff didn’t know. But for my son’s sake, I needed to know.

Gabriel deserves the full range of academic and social experiences. So every day I make sure he’s learning in the least-restrictive environment — from the classroom, to phys ed, to field trips.

I believe the Department of Education also wants to make schools accessible and to place students with different abilities in settings where they’ll flourish, but the current system is not equipped to follow through on those good intentions. While I see gradual changes, I still know that if I don’t find the best placement for my son the system definitely won’t.

At the school level, administrators should know the details of their own school’s accessibility. Teachers should learn to include children with different abilities in their classrooms. Such a commitment means recognizing the value of inclusivity — not viewing accessibility as something ADA says you must do.

Before I had Gabriel, I never thought about accessibility. I never looked at street cutouts or thought about how to enter a store with steps. We’re probably all guilty of perpetuating exclusion at one point or another.

Recognizing that will allow us to change the status quo. It will allow every individual with a physical disability to fully participate in the public school system.

Claire Fontaine is a researcher at Data & Society, a research institute in New York City focused on social, cultural, and ethical issues arising from technological development. Kinjal Dave is a research assistant at Data & Society. You can read more about their project, which seeks to better understand the ways in which diverse New York City parents draw on school performance data, online dashboards, and school review websites when researching schools for their children.

First Person

I covered Tennessee’s ed beat for Chalkbeat. Here’s what I learned.

PHOTO: Marta W. Aldrich
Grace Tatter covers a press conference at the Tennessee State Capitol in 2015.

For three years, I covered the Statehouse for Chalkbeat Tennessee, reporting on how policies from Nashville trickled down into more than 1,800 public schools across the state.

Now I’m starting back to school myself, pursuing graduate studies aimed at helping me to become a better education journalist. I’m taking with me six things I learned on the job about public education in Tennessee.

1. Apathy is often cited as a major problem facing education. That’s not the case in Tennessee.

I heard from hundreds of parents, educators, and students who were passionate about what’s happening — good and bad — inside of schools. I covered crowded school board meetings and regularly scrambled for an open seat at legislative hearings where parents had filled the room after driving since dawn to beat the opening gavel. Not incidentally, those parents usually came from communities with the “worst” schools and the lowest test scores. While many disagreements exist about the best way to run schools, there is no shortage of people, particularly parents and educators, who care.

2. Tennessee has one of the most fascinating education stories in America.

I’ve had a front-row seat to massive changes in K-12 education under reforms ushered in by Race to the Top — an overhaul being tracked closely well beyond the state’s borders. But the national interest and import doesn’t end with changes stemming from the $500 million federal award. Tennessee is home to some of the nation’s premier education researchers, making its classrooms laboratories for new ideas about pre-K, school turnaround, and literacy instruction, just to name a few. And at the legislature, more lobbyists are devoted to education than to most any other cause. A lot of eyes are on Tennessee schools.

3. The education community is not as divided as it looks.

During the course of just a few years, I watched state lawmakers change their positions on accountability and school vouchers. I witnessed “anti-charter” activists praise charter leaders for their work. I chronicled task force meetings where state leaders who were committed to standardized testing found middle ground with classroom educators concerned that it’s gone too far. In short, a lot of people listened to each other and changed their minds. Watching such consensus-building reminded me that, while there are no simple debates about education, there is a widespread commitment to making it better.

4. Money matters.

Even when stories don’t seem to be about money, they usually are. How much money is being spent on testing, teacher salaries, school discipline reform? How much should be available for wraparound services? Why do some schools have more money than others? Is there enough to go around? Tennessee leaders have steadily upped public education spending, but the state still invests less than most other states, and the disparities among districts are gaping. That’s why more than a handful of school districts are battling with the state in court. Conversations about money are inextricable from conversations about improving schools.

5. Race is a significant education issue, but few leaders are willing to have that conversation.

More than 60 years after Brown v. Board of Education, Tennessee’s schools are largely racially segregated. Yet most policymakers tread lightly, if ever, into conversations about achieving real racial integration. And in many cases — such as a 2011 law enabling mostly white suburban Shelby County towns to secede from the mostly black Memphis district — they’ve actually gone backwards. Then there’s the achievement data. The annual release of test scores unleashes a flurry of conversation around the racial achievement gap. But the other 11 months of the year, I heard little about whether state and local policies are closing those gaps — or contributing to them — or the historical reasons why the gaps exist in the first place. To be sure, state leadership is trying to address some of Tennessee’s shortcomings. For example, the State Department of Education has launched modestly funded initiatives to recruit more teachers of color. But often, race and racism are the elephants in the room.

6. Still, there’s lots to celebrate.

If there were unlimited hours in the day, I could have written thousands of stories about what’s going right in public education. Every day, I received story ideas about collaborations with NASA in Oak Ridge, high school trips to Europe from Memphis, gourmet school lunches in Tullahoma, and learning partnerships with the Nashville Zoo. Even in schools with the steepest challenges, they were stories that inspire happiness and hope. They certainly inspired me.

Grace Tatter graduated from public schools in Winston-Salem, N.C., and received her bachelor’s degree in history from the University of North Carolina. She’s now pursuing a master’s degree in specialized studies at the Harvard Graduate School of Education.